Read Comments Commentaires (2)

• Djoppen 3 hours ago

  C'est quoi l'intérêt de ce texte pour naifs et faibles d'esprit?!
  De toutes les luttes de révolutionnaires, les russes ont été sympathisants.
  L'occident colonisant a de tout temps été nos bourreaux.
  Les russes sauro ...
  read full comment

  C'est quoi l'intérêt de ce texte pour naifs et faibles d'esprit?!
  De toutes les luttes de révolutionnaires, les russes ont été sympathisants.
  L'occident colonisant a de tout temps été nos bourreaux.
  Les russes sauront mourir avec les nouveaux peuples d'Afrique pour la liberté.
  Exprimez vous clairement pour être bien compris. Sinon taisez-vous. La Russie est le bon partenaire pour la lutte contre le colonisateur français jusqu'à preuve de contraire.
  Si les personnages que vous citez se servent de la Russie pour escroquer les gens ,comme vous vous servez de votre jeune afrique de la France-Afrique pour aliéner les masses, c'est regrettable pour le Cameroun.
  Mais avec la Russie nous lutterons!
  Dénoncez les objectivement et dites nous avec qui la Russie devra nous accompagner dans la lutte.
  Sinon allez écrire pour Macron et les français!

  reply
• reader 1 hour ago

  It is a "shame" to know that you people are not aware that JA is a western propaganda tool and its role is to keep African media confused in the process of interpretation of global events. Widen your horizon to understand the ...
  read full comment

  It is a "shame" to know that you people are not aware that JA is a western propaganda tool and its role is to keep African media confused in the process of interpretation of global events. Widen your horizon to understand the real stakes. core grievance for many African journalists and intellectuals who feel that the "rules" of global journalism are written by the same powers that colonized the continent.
  When Western media outlets set the standards, they often create a "credibility gatekeeper" system. This creates several unfair disadvantages for African journalists:
  The "Agency" Gap: If an African journalist chooses to partner with Russia or China to counter Western influence, they are often labeled "puppets" or "propagandists." However, when other journalists receive funding or training from Western NGOs (like USAID or the BBC Media Action), it is framed as "capacity building." This suggests that African journalists lack the agency to make their own strategic choices.
  Narrative Monopolies: Because Western outlets have more money and global reach, their version of events becomes the "international record." African journalists who challenge that record—even if they have better local context—are often marginalized or flagged by social media algorithms as "unreliable."
  The "Safety" of the Status Quo: Western journalists are rarely punished for being "pro-West" because that is the default setting of the global media landscape. African journalists who seek to "change the mindset" (as you mentioned earlier) are taking a career risk because they are moving against that established power structure.
  The Real-World Impact
  Targeting these journalists can lead to de-platforming (losing Facebook or YouTube accounts) or being blacklisted from international reporting grants. This can feel like a new form of informational colonialism, where African voices are only "legitimate" if they fit into a Western-approved box. try to know the alternative and and then act independently

  reply